Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38549239›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor basic research2024

Questionnaire-Based Study of 392 Women in Abbottabad, Pakistan, to Evaluate the Types of Cosmetic Products Purchased Between December 2018 and March 2019 and Their Associated Adverse Events.

Fatima Nisar, Atif Ali, Hira Shahid, Muhammad Mamoon Iqbal, Hira Khan, Qasim Khan, Ayesha Iqbal, Sana Samreen, Wajid Syed, Mahmood Basil A Al-Rawi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor basic research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Assessment of Undergraduate Nursing Students' Understanding of Herbal Medicines and Herb-Drug Interactions in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Fatima NisarDepartment of Pharmacy, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Atif AliDepartment of Pharmacy, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Hira ShahidSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Muhammad Mamoon IqbalInternal Medicine Trainee, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Hira KhanDepartment of Pharmacy, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology, Havelian, Pakistan.
Qasim KhanDepartment of Pharmacy, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Ayesha IqbalDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, University Park Campus, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sana SamreenAurobindo College of Pharmacy, Warangal, Telangana, India.
Wajid SyedDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmood Basil A Al-RawiDepartment of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
COMSATS University Islamabad · PKKing Saud University · SAAbbottabad University of Science and Technology · PKSouth China Normal University · CNUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Cosmetics are applied topically to enhance appearance and are commonly used by women of all ages. Cosmetics contain many chemical agents, but the incidence of adverse reactions is low, possibly due to underreporting. This questionnaire-based study included 392 women to evaluate information on the types of cosmetics purchased between December 2018 and March 2019, their use by the women surveyed, and their associated adverse events. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted among 392 women in Abbottabad, Pakistan, using a pre-structured and validated questionnaire to evaluate information on the types of cosmetics, their use, and their associated adverse events. Part 1 of the study collected information about demographics. Part 2 contained a total of 11 items, and collected the frequency of use of cosmetic on skin and hair care products. Part 3 consisted of 4 items and collected information about problems encountered due to the use of cosmetics. RESULTS In the winter season, 47.7% (n=187) of women preferred chemical-based cosmetic products, while 30.9% (n=121) preferred Ayurvedic products. Among commonly used cosmetic products, 26.9% (n=106) of women used foundations. The most frequently used skin care product was face wash 39.5% (n=155). The most prevalent adverse events related to cosmetics were pimples (19.9%, n=78), redness (17.6%, n=69), and eye discomfort (15.8%, n=62). Furthermore, 51.3% (n=201) strongly agreed that cosmetics aid in getting a whiter complexion. CONCLUSIONS The survey concluded that most women preferred cosmetics with a chemical base, which are associated with rashes, redness, and acne. It is important to encourage cosmetovigilance and awareness campaigns among cosmetic product sellers and users.

Indexed as

CosmeticsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPakistanSurveys and QuestionnairesCosmetics

Identifiers

PMID38549239
PMCPMC10986314
OpenAlexW4393316012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.