Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38549194›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2024

The effects of parental presence on amygdala and mPFC activation during fear conditioning: An exploratory study.

Lior Abramson, Bridget L Callaghan, Jennifer A Silvers, Tricia Choy, Michelle VanTieghem, Anna Vannucci, Andrea Fields, Nim Tottenham

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prefrontal cortex development and its implications in mental illness.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparing the neural bases of self- and social-reappraisal.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lior AbramsonDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Bridget L CallaghanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5736-2510
Jennifer A SilversDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6615-5473
Tricia ChoyDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Michelle VanTieghemDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Anna VannucciDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1617-7006
Andrea FieldsDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Nim TottenhamDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA.
City University of New York · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Predicting Heterogeneous Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in School-age Children with Early Caregiving AdversitiesR01MH091864 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER, TOTTENHAM, NIM · 2010 to 2022
$5.1M
Early Adversity and Human Microbiome- Hippocampal Development: Anxiety AssociationsK99MH113821 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI CALLAGHAN, BRIDGET L · 2017 to 2018
$249k
Neurocomputational Mechanisms of Affective Semantic Memory DevelopmentF99NS134207 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI VANNUCCI, ANNA · 2023 to 2024
$98k
Columbia University: Provost's Grants Program for Junior Faculty who Contribute to the Diversity Goals of the UniversityNIMH NIH HHS K99 MH113821NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091864NIMH NIH HHS R01MH091864NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS134207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning safe versus dangerous cues is crucial for survival. During development, parents can influence fear learning by buffering their children's stress response and increasing exploration of potentially aversive stimuli. Rodent findings suggest that these behavioral effects are mediated through parental presence modulation of the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Here, we investigated whether similar parental modulation of amygdala and mPFC during fear learning occurs in humans. Using a within-subjects design, behavioral (final N = 48, 6-17 years, mean = 11.61, SD = 2.84, 60% females/40% males) and neuroimaging data (final N = 39, 6-17 years, mean = 12.03, SD = 2.98, 59% females/41% males) were acquired during a classical fear conditioning task, which included a CS+ followed by an aversive noise (US; 75% reinforcement rate) and a CS-. Conditioning occurred once in physical contact with the participant's parent and once alone (order counterbalanced). Region of interest analyses examined the unconditioned stress response by BOLD activation to the US (vs. implicit baseline) and learning by activation to the CS+ (vs. CS-). Results showed that during US presentation, parental presence reduced the centromedial amygdala activity, suggesting buffering of the unconditioned stress response. In response to learned stimuli, parental presence reduced mPFC activity to the CS+ (relative to the CS-), although this result did not survive multiple comparisons' correction. These preliminary findings indicate that parents modulate amygdala and mPFC activity during exposure to unconditioned and conditioned fear stimuli, potentially providing insight into the neural mechanisms by which parents act as a social buffer during fear learning. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: This study used a within-participant experimental design to investigate how parental presence (vs. absence) affects youth's neural responses in a classical fear conditioning task. Parental presence reduced the youth's centromedial amygdala activation to the unconditioned stimulus (US), suggesting parental buffering of the neural unconditioned response (UR). Parental presence reduced the youth's mPFC activation to a conditioned threat cue (CS+) compared to a safety cue (CS-), suggesting possible parental modulation of fear learning.

Indexed as

AmygdalaConditioning, ClassicalFearMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal CortexAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleParentsamygdalaclassical conditioningfear learningmPFCparentingsocial buffering

Identifiers

PMID38549194
PMCPMC11436486
OpenAlexW4393316343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.