Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38549031›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Current Challenges and Future Directions in Peptidomics.

Michael Schrader, Lloyd D Fricker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael SchraderDepartment of Bioengineering Sciences, Weihenstephan-Tr. University of Applied Sciences, Freising, Germany. michael.schrader@hswt.de.
Lloyd D FrickerDepartments of Molecular Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of peptidomics has been under development since its start more than 20 years ago. In this chapter we provide a personal outlook for future directions in this field. The applications of peptidomics technologies are spreading more and more from classical research of peptide hormones and neuropeptides towards commercial applications in plant and food-science. Many clinical applications have been developed to analyze the complexity of biofluids, which are being addressed with new instrumentation, automization, and data processing. Additionally, the newly developed field of immunopeptidomics is showing promise for cancer therapies. In conclusion, peptidomics will continue delivering important information in classical fields like neuropeptides and peptide hormones, benefiting from improvements in state-of-the-art technologies. Moreover, new directions of research such as immunopeptidomics will further complement classical omics technologies and may become routine clinical procedures. Taken together, discoveries of new substances, networks, and applications of peptides can be expected in different disciplines.

Indexed as

NeuropeptidesPeptide HormonesProteomicsNeuropeptidesPeptide HormonesFuture perspectivesOutlookPeptidomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.