Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38549016›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Neuropeptidomics of Genetically Defined Cell Types in Mouse Brain.

Lloyd D Fricker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lloyd D FrickerDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. Lloyd.Fricker@Einsteinmed.edu.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptidomic techniques are powerful tools to identify peptides in a biological sample. In the case of brain, which contains a complex mixture of cell types, standard peptidomics procedures reveal the major peptides in a dissected brain region. It is difficult to obtain information on peptides within a specific cell type using standard approaches, unless that cell type can be isolated. This protocol describes a targeted peptidomic approach that uses affinity chromatography to purify peptides that are substrates of carboxypeptidase E (CPE), an enzyme present in the secretory pathway of neuroendocrine cells. Many CPE products function as neuropeptides and/or peptide hormones, and therefore represent an important subset of the peptidome. Because CPE removes C-terminal Lys and Arg residues from peptide processing intermediates, organisms lacking CPE show a large decrease in the levels of the mature forms of most neuropeptides and peptide hormones, and a very large increase in the levels of the processing intermediates that contain C-terminal Lys and/or Arg (i.e., the CPE substrates). These CPE substrates can be purified on an anhydrotrypsin-agarose affinity resin, which specifically binds peptides with C-terminal basic residues. When this method is used with mice lacking CPE activity in genetically defined cell types, it allows the detection of peptides specifically produced in that cell type.

Indexed as

NeuropeptidesPeptide HormonesAnimalsBrainCarboxypeptidase HCarboxypeptidasesChromatography, AffinityMiceCarboxypeptidase HCarboxypeptidasesNeuropeptidesPeptide HormonesAffinity chromatographyAnhydrotrypsinCarboxypeptidase ENeuropeptide

Identifiers

PMID38549016
OpenAlexW4393285651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.