ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Integrating a Multi-label Deep Learning Approach with Protein Information to Compare Bioactive Peptides in Brain and Plasma.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discovery of peptides as key regulators of metabolic and cardiovascular crosstalk.Cell reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peptide therapeutics is gaining momentum. Advances in the field of peptidomics have enabled researchers to harvest vital information from various organisms and tissue types concerning peptide existence, expression and function. The development of mass spectrometry techniques for high-throughput peptide quantitation has paved the way for the identification and discovery of numerous known and novel peptides. Though much has been achieved, scientists are still facing difficulties when it comes to reducing the search space of the large mass spectrometry-generated peptidomics datasets and focusing on the subset of functionally relevant peptides. Moreover, there is currently no straightforward way to analytically compare the distributions of bioactive peptides in distinct biological samples, which may reveal much useful information when seeking to characterize tissue- or fluid-specific peptidomes. In this chapter, we demonstrate how to identify, rank, and compare predicted bioactive peptides and bioactivity distributions from extensive peptidomics datasets. To aid this task, we utilize MultiPep, a multi-label deep learning approach designed for classifying peptide bioactivities, to identify bioactive peptides. The predicted bioactivities are synergistically combined with protein information from the UniProt database, which assist in navigating through the jungle of putative therapeutic peptides and relevant peptide leads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.