ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Label-Free Quantitation of Endogenous Peptides.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discovery and Validation of Novel Umami Peptides from Traditional Broad Bean Paste (Doubanjiang).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based peptidomics methods allow for the detection and identification of many peptides in a complex biological mixture in an untargeted manner. Quantitative peptidomics approaches allow for comparisons of peptide abundance between different samples, allowing one to draw conclusions about peptide differences as a function of experimental treatment or physiology. While stable isotope labeling is a powerful approach for quantitative proteomics and peptidomics, advances in mass spectrometry instrumentation and analysis tools have allowed label-free methods to gain popularity in recent years. In a general label-free quantitative peptidomics experiment, peak intensity information for each peptide is compared across multiple LC-MS runs. Here, we outline a general approach for label-free quantitative peptidomics experiments, including steps for sample preparation, LC-MS data acquisition, data processing, and statistical analysis. Special attention is paid to address run-to-run variability, which can lead to several major problems in label-free experiments. Overall, our method provides researchers with a framework for the development of their own quantitative peptidomics workflows applicable to quantitation of peptides from a wide variety of different biological sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.