Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38549009›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Data-Independent Acquisition Peptidomics.

Leon Bichmann, Shubham Gupta, Hannes Röst

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Uniquome-Based Method for Proteins Identification by Mass Spectrometry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leon BichmannDepartment of Computer Science, Applied Bioinformatics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Shubham GuptaDonnelly Center for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hannes RöstDonnelly Center for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, data-independent acquisition (DIA) has emerged as a powerful analysis method in biological mass spectrometry (MS). Compared to the previously predominant data-dependent acquisition (DDA), it offers a way to achieve greater reproducibility, sensitivity, and dynamic range in MS measurements. To make DIA accessible to non-expert users, a multifunctional, automated high-throughput pipeline DIAproteomics was implemented in the computational workflow framework "Nextflow" ( https://nextflow.io ). This allows high-throughput processing of proteomics and peptidomics DIA datasets on diverse computing infrastructures. This chapter provides a short summary and usage protocol guide for the most important modes of operation of this pipeline regarding the analysis of peptidomics datasets using the command line. In brief, DIAproteomics is a wrapper around the OpenSwathWorkflow and relies on either existing or ad-hoc generated spectral libraries from matching DDA runs. The OpenSwathWorkflow extracts chromatograms from the DIA runs and performs chromatographic peak-picking. Further downstream of the pipeline, these peaks are scored, aligned, and statistically evaluated for qualitative and quantitative differences across conditions depending on the user's interest. DIAproteomics is open-source and available under a permissive license. We encourage the scientific community to use or modify the pipeline to meet their specific requirements.

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsChromatography, LiquidMass SpectrometryReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareWorkflowProteomeAutomated data analysisBiological mass spectrometryDIANextflowPeptidomicsProteomicsSWATH

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.