Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38549007›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Two Different Strategies for Stabilization of Brain Tissue and Extraction of Neuropeptides.

Elva Fridjonsdottir, Anna Nilsson, Lloyd D Fricker, Per E Andrén

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elva FridjonsdottirDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Spatial Mass Spectrometry, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna NilssonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Spatial Mass Spectrometry, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lloyd D FrickerDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Per E AndrénDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Spatial Mass Spectrometry, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. per.andren@uu.se.
Science for Life Laboratory · SEAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropeptides are bioactive peptides that are synthesized and secreted by neurons in signaling pathways in the brain. Peptides and proteins are extremely vulnerable to proteolytic cleavage when their biological surrounding changes. This makes neuropeptidomics challenging due to the rapid alterations that occur to the peptidome after harvesting of brain tissue samples. For a successful neuropeptidomic study, the biological tissue sample analyzed should resemble the living state as much as possible. Heat stabilization has been proven to inhibit postmortem degradation by denaturing proteolytic enzymes, hence increasing identification rates of neuropeptides. Here, we describe two different stabilization protocols for rodent brain samples that increase the number of intact mature neuropeptides and minimize interference from degradation products of abundant proteins. Additionally, we present an extraction protocol that aims to extract a wide range of hydrophilic and hydrophobic neuropeptides by sequentially using an aqueous and an organic extraction medium.

Indexed as

NeuropeptidesBrainPeptide HydrolasesPeptidesProteolysisNeuropeptidesPeptide HydrolasesPeptidesBrain tissueElectrospray mass spectrometryExtractionHeat inactivationNeuropeptidesPostmortem degradationSample preparationStabilization

Identifiers

PMID38549007
OpenAlexW4393285634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.