ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Dedicated Regions-of-Interest Based Multi-Parameter Quantitative Ultrashort Echo Time (UTE) Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee Joint.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerated ultrashort echo time quantitative magnetization transfer (UTE-qMT) imaging of macromolecular fraction (MMF) in cortical bone based on a self-attention convolutional neural network.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We proposed an end-to-end deep learning convolutional neural network (DCNN) for region-of-interest based multi-parameter quantification (RMQ-Net) to accelerate quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI of the knee joint with automatic multi-tissue segmentation and relaxometry mapping. The study involved UTE-based T1 (UTE-T1) and Adiabatic T1ρ (UTE-AdiabT1ρ) mapping of the knee joint of 65 human subjects, including 20 normal controls, 29 with doubtful-minimal osteoarthritis (OA), and 16 with moderate-severe OA. Comparison studies were performed on UTE-T1 and UTE-AdiabT1ρ measurements using 100%, 43%, 26%, and 18% UTE MRI data as the inputs and the effects on the prediction quality of the RMQ-Net. The RMQ-net was modified and retrained accordingly with different combinations of inputs. Both ROI-based and voxel-based Pearson correlation analyses were performed. High Pearson correlation coefficients were achieved between the RMQ-Net predicted UTE-T1 and UTE-AdiabT1ρ results and the ground truth for segmented cartilage with acceleration factors ranging from 2.3 to 5.7. With an acceleration factor of 5.7, the Pearson r-value achieved 0.908 (ROI-based) and 0.945 (voxel-based) for UTE-T1, and 0.733 (ROI-based) and 0.895 (voxel-based) for UTE-AdiabT1ρ, correspondingly. The results demonstrated that RMQ-net can significantly accelerate quantitative UTE imaging with automated segmentation of articular cartilage in the knee joint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.