Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38548953›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2024

Development and Validation of a Cell-Based Binding Neutralizing Antibody Assay for an Antibody-Drug Conjugate.

Weifeng Xu, Nazneen Bano, Olguitza Guzman-Valdes, Jessica Amberman, Elisha Bandlamudi, Pooja Khanna, Rebecca Carmean, Roy Helmy

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weifeng XuMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, 07065, USA. Weifeng.xu2@merck.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7598-1489
Nazneen Bano *Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, 07065, USA.
Olguitza Guzman-Valdes *PPD Clinical Research Business, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Richmond, Virginia, 23832, USA.
Jessica Amberman *PPD Clinical Research Business, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Richmond, Virginia, 23832, USA.
Elisha Bandlamudi *Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, 07065, USA.
Pooja KhannaMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, 07065, USA.
Rebecca CarmeanPPD Clinical Research Business, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Richmond, Virginia, 23832, USA.
Roy HelmyMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, 07065, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USThermo Fisher Scientific (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utilization of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has gained considerable attention in the field of targeted cancer therapy due to their ability to synergistically combine the specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and the potency of small molecular drugs. However, the immunogenic nature of the antibody component within ADCs warrants the need for robust immunogenicity testing, including a neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay. Since the mechanism of action (MOA) of the ADC is to first bind to the target cells and then release the payload intracellularly to kill the cells, the most relevant NAb assay format would be a cell-based killing assay. However, in this paper, we present a case where a cell-based killing assay could not be developed after multiple cell lines and NAb-positive controls (PC) had been tested. Surprisingly, contrary to our expectations, all NAb PCs tested exhibited an increased killing effect on the target cells, instead of the expected protective response. This unexpected phenomenon most likely is due to the non-specific internalization of drug/NAb complexes via FcγRs, as an excessive amount of human IgG1 and mouse IgG2a, but not mouse IgG1, greatly inhibited drug or drug/NAb complexes induced cell death. To overcome this obstacle, we implemented a novel cell-based binding assay utilizing the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) platform. We also propose that an in vitro cell killing NAb assay is limited to at best monitoring the target binding and internalization induced cell death, but not by-stander killing induced by prematurely released or dead-cell released payload, hence cannot really mimic the in vivo MOA of ADC.

Indexed as

ImmunoconjugatesAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingCell LineHumansImmunoglobulin GMiceAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingImmunoconjugatesImmunoglobulin Gantibody–drug conjugate (ADC)cell-based killing assayFc receptors (FcγRs)immunogenicity testingMeso Scale Discovery (MSD)neutralizing antibody (NAb)

Identifiers

PMID38548953
OpenAlexW4393251493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.