Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38548926›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2024

Clinician perspectives on policy approaches to genetic risk disclosure in families.

Amicia Phillips, Danya F Vears, Ine Van Hoyweghen, Pascal Borry

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amicia PhillipsCentre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium. amicia.phillips@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-4467-685X
Danya F VearsCentre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6290-545X
Ine Van HoyweghenLife Sciences and Society Lab, Center for Sociological Research, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9402-2918
Pascal BorryCentre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4931-9560
Department of Public Health · MMThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 101057721KU Leuven C14/18/089Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven PDMT2/23/074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic sequencing has emerged as a powerful tool with significant implications for patients and their relatives, however, empirical evidence suggests that effective dissemination of risk information within families remains a challenge. Policy responses to address this issue vary across countries, with Belgium notably lacking specific regulations governing nondisclosure of genetic risk. In this study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians from Belgian clinical genetics centers to gain insight into their perspectives on policy approaches to the disclosure of genetic risk within families. Using real-world examples of legislation and court rulings from France, Australia, and the UK, we explored clinician viewpoints on the roles and responsibilities of both patients and clinicians in the family communication process. Clinicians expressed confusion regarding what was legally permissible regarding contacting at-risk relatives. While there was a consensus among participants that patients have a responsibility to inform their at-risk relatives, participants were hesitant to support the legal enforcement of this duty. Clinicians mostly recognized some responsibility to at-risk relatives, but the extent of this responsibility was a subject of division. Our findings highlight the need for a comprehensive policy that clarifies the roles and responsibilities of clinicians and patients to inform at-risk relatives. Furthermore, the study underscores the practical challenges clinicians face in supporting patients through the complex process of family communication, suggesting a need for additional resources and the exploration of alternative approaches to communication.

Indexed as

FamilyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBelgiumDisclosureFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHealth PolicyHumansMaleEthicsGeneticsGenomicsPolicyQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38548926
PMCPMC11233314
OpenAlexW4393253180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.