Observational studySpinal cord2024
Assessment of renal function in persons with motor complete spinal cord injury-cystatin C as an accurate single marker.
Observational study in Spinal cord, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding kidney function: evaluating arterial resistive index and cystatin C serum values in individuals with spinal cord injury.World journal of urology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designObservational cohort.
aimTo show that Cystatin C is an accurate single marker to estimate GFR in motor complete persons with SCI.
objectivesTo assess if Cystatin C is an accurate for estimating GFR in persons with SCI with no preserved motor power. To study if use of Serum creatinine for estimation of GFR in this population significantly overestimates GFR, thereby inaccurate.
settingTertiary care hospital and Medical College, Vellore, South India.
methods30 persons with SCI (ASIA A and B) fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited. Serum Creatinine and Serum Cystatin C values were obtained, and eGFR was calculated based on available formulae. 24-h urine for urine creatinine clearance-based eGFR was used as a reference value.
resultsAnalysis with a Bland-Atman plot showed that eGFR estimated with Serum Cystatin C was more accurate than Serum Creatinine, using 24-h urine creatinine as a reference value. eGFR using Serum Creatinine significantly overestimated GFR by over 50.6%. Estimated GFR using Serum Cystatin C showed a meager mean difference of 0.5% from the reference 24-h urine creatinine clearance (mean difference of -2.56%).
conclusionSerum Cystatin C is a much more accurate marker for estimating GFR in SCI, compared to serum Creatinine which overestimates GFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.