ArticleScientific reports2024
Comprehensive study on the Python-based regression machine learning models for prediction of uniaxial compressive strength using multiple parameters in Charnockite rocks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strength characterization of limestone lithofacies under different moisture states.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advanced machine learning models for predicting unconfined compressive strength from point load strength index of rock samples from Chennai and Bangalore.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The strength of rock under uniaxial compression, commonly known as Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS), plays a crucial role in various geomechanical applications such as designing foundations, mining projects, slopes in rocks, tunnel construction, and rock characterization. However, sampling and preparation can become challenging in some rocks, making it difficult to determine the UCS of the rocks directly. Therefore, indirect approaches are widely used for estimating UCS. This study presents two Machine Learning Models, Simple Linear Regression and Step-wise Regression, implemented in Python to calculate the UCS of Charnockite rocks. The models consider Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV), Schmidt Hammer Rebound Number (N), Brazilian Tensile Strength (BTS), and Point Load Index (PLI) as factors for forecasting the UCS of Charnockite samples. Three regression metrics, including Coefficient of Regression (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.