Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38548823›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Air pollutant prediction model based on transfer learning two-stage attention mechanism.

Zhanfei Ma, Bisheng Wang, Wenli Luo, Jing Jiang, Dongxiang Liu, Hui Wei, HaoYe Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhanfei MaSchool of Information Science and Technology, Baotou Teachers' College, Baotou, 014010, Inner Mongolia, China.
Bisheng WangSchool of Information Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, 014010, Inner Mongolia, China. ambitious0913@163.com.
Wenli LuoSchool of Information Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, 014010, Inner Mongolia, China.
Jing JiangSchool of Information Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, 014010, Inner Mongolia, China.
Dongxiang LiuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Baotou Teachers' College, Baotou, 014010, Inner Mongolia, China.
Hui WeiSchool of Information Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, 014010, Inner Mongolia, China.
HaoYe LuoSchool of Information Science and Technology, Baotou Teachers' College, Baotou, 014010, Inner Mongolia, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61762071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atmospheric pollution significantly impacts the regional economy and human health, and its prediction has been increasingly emphasized. The performance of traditional prediction methods is limited due to the lack of historical data support in new atmospheric monitoring sites. Therefore, this paper proposes a two-stage attention mechanism model based on transfer learning (TL-AdaBiGRU). First, the first stage of the model utilizes a temporal distribution characterization algorithm to segment the air pollutant sequences into periods. It introduces a temporal attention mechanism to assign self-learning weights to the period segments in order to filter out essential period features. Then, in the second stage of the model, a multi-head external attention mechanism is introduced to mine the network's hidden layer key features. Finally, the adequate knowledge learned by the model at the source domain site is migrated to the new site to improve the prediction capability of the new site. The results show that (1) the model is modeled from the data distribution perspective, and the critical information within the sequence of periodic segments is mined in depth. (2) The model employs a unique two-stage attention mechanism to capture complex nonlinear relationships in air pollutant data. (3) Compared with the existing models, the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of the model decreased by 14%, 13%, and 4%, respectively, and the prediction accuracy was greatly improved.

Identifiers

PMID38548823
PMCPMC10978953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.