Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38548750›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Improved tactile speech robustness to background noise with a dual-path recurrent neural network noise-reduction method.

Mark D Fletcher, Samuel W Perry, Iordanis Thoidis, Carl A Verschuur, Tobias Goehring

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark D FletcherUniversity of Southampton Auditory Implant Service, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. M.D.Fletcher@soton.ac.uk.
Samuel W PerryUniversity of Southampton Auditory Implant Service, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Iordanis ThoidisSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Carl A VerschuurUniversity of Southampton Auditory Implant Service, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Tobias GoehringMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
University of Southampton · GBAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T03095X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many people with hearing loss struggle to understand speech in noisy environments, making noise robustness critical for hearing-assistive devices. Recently developed haptic hearing aids, which convert audio to vibration, can improve speech-in-noise performance for cochlear implant (CI) users and assist those unable to access hearing-assistive devices. They are typically body-worn rather than head-mounted, allowing additional space for batteries and microprocessors, and so can deploy more sophisticated noise-reduction techniques. The current study assessed whether a real-time-feasible dual-path recurrent neural network (DPRNN) can improve tactile speech-in-noise performance. Audio was converted to vibration on the wrist using a vocoder method, either with or without noise reduction. Performance was tested for speech in a multi-talker noise (recorded at a party) with a 2.5-dB signal-to-noise ratio. An objective assessment showed the DPRNN improved the scale-invariant signal-to-distortion ratio by 8.6 dB and substantially outperformed traditional noise-reduction (log-MMSE). A behavioural assessment in 16 participants showed the DPRNN improved tactile-only sentence identification in noise by 8.2%. This suggests that advanced techniques like the DPRNN could substantially improve outcomes with haptic hearing aids. Low-cost haptic devices could soon be an important supplement to hearing-assistive devices such as CIs or offer an alternative for people who cannot access CI technology.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsHearing LossSpeech PerceptionHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSpeech

Identifiers

PMID38548750
PMCPMC10978864
OpenAlexW4393268571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.