ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2024
A Validated Risk Stratification That Incorporates MAGIC Biomarkers Predicts Long-Term Outcomes in Pediatric Patients with Acute GVHD.
Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical correlation between plasma biomarker levels and post-transplant complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Acute and Chronic Cutaneous Graft-versus-Host Disease: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Emerging Directions.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Impact of age on graft-versus-host disease and overall survival in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Critical care in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Common complications and management.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in graft-versus-host disease: emerging therapeutic strategies, biomarker discoveries, and innovative treatment approaches.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Gastrointestinal acute graft versus host disease: a translational perspective from pathogenesis to precision prevention and treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The MAGIC composite response: a novel end point integrating clinical and biomarker parameters for acute GVHD.Blood advances · 2025Article
- JAK2 Inhibitors and Emerging Therapies in Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Prediction and Prognostication of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease by MAGIC Biomarkers.American journal of hematology · 2025Review
- Whole-Blood Longitudinal Molecular Profiling Maps the Road of Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD).Cancers · 2025Article
- Age-enhanced MAGIC algorithm predicts mortality in pediatric aGVHD: a multicenter study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors at 17 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a common and serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in children but overall clinical grade at onset only modestly predicts response to treatment and survival outcomes. Two tools to assess risk at initiation of treatment were recently developed. The Minnesota risk system stratifies children for risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) according to the pattern of GVHD target organ severity. The Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) algorithm of 2 serum biomarkers (ST2 and REG3α) predicts NRM in adult patients but has not been validated in a pediatric population. We aimed to develop and validate a system that stratifies children at the onset of GVHD for risk of 6-month NRM. We determined the MAGIC algorithm probabilities (MAPs) and Minnesota risk for a multicenter cohort of 315 pediatric patients who developed GVHD requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids. MAPs created 3 risk groups with distinct outcomes at the start of treatment and were more accurate than Minnesota risk stratification for prediction of NRM (area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), .79 versus .62, P = .001). A novel model that combined Minnesota risk and biomarker scores created from a training cohort was more accurate than either biomarkers or clinical systems in a validation cohort (AUC .87) and stratified patients into 2 groups with highly different 6-month NRM (5% versus 38%, P < .001). In summary, we validated the MAP as a prognostic biomarker in pediatric patients with GVHD, and a novel risk stratification that combines Minnesota risk and biomarker risk performed best. Biomarker-based risk stratification can be used in clinical trials to develop more tailored approaches for children who require treatment for GVHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.