Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38548099›Full record

ArticleChest2024

Flow Cytometry as an Alternative to Microscopy for the Differentiation of BAL Fluid Leukocytes.

Kai Bratke, Martin Weise, Paul Stoll, J Christian Virchow, Marek Lommatzsch

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai BratkeDepartment of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Rostock, Germany.
Martin WeiseDepartment of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Rostock, Germany.
Paul StollDepartment of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Rostock, Germany.
J Christian VirchowDepartment of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Rostock, Germany.
Marek LommatzschDepartment of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Rostock, Germany. Electronic address: marek.lommatzsch@med.uni-rostock.de.
University of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroscopy is currently the gold standard to differentiate BAL fluid (BALF) leukocytes. However, local expertise for microscopic BALF leukocyte differentiation is often unavailable in clinical practice. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can automated flow cytometry be used instead of microscopy to differentiate BALF leukocytes? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsA new automated flow cytometric method for BALF leukocyte differentiation, using four antibodies (anti-CD45, anti-CD66b, anti-HLA-DR, anti-CD52) given to human BALF in one tube, was developed and prospectively validated in 745 unselected subsequent BALF samples from patients with interstitial lung diseases (455 patients), infectious diseases (196 patients), and other diseases (94 patients). Flow cytometry and traditional microscopy were performed by separate investigators in a double-anonymized fashion. Results were compared using Spearman correlation, Deming regression, and Bland-Altman analysis.

resultsThere was a strong correlation between flow cytometric and microscopic results regarding macrophage/monocyte, lymphocyte, eosinophil, and neutrophil percentages in BALF (P < .001 for all leukocyte subpopulations). Bland-Altman analyses showed that the mean differences between the methods were ≤ 2% for all four cell types. Flow cytometric results differed less than 20% from microscopic results in more than 95% of all samples. Subgroup analyses confirmed that these results were independent from total leukocyte counts in BALF.

interpretationWe report, to our knowledge, the first validated flow cytometric method for BALF leukocyte differentiation, which can be used in clinical settings where local expertise for microscopic analysis is unavailable and which can be combined easily with lymphocyte surface marker analysis.

Indexed as

Bronchoalveolar Lavage FluidFlow CytometryLeukocytesMicroscopyAgedFemaleHumansLeukocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesBAL fluidflow cytometryleukocytesmicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID38548099
PMCPMC11492222
OpenAlexW4393189008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.