Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38547444›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2024

Race and ethnicity reporting and representation in hemophilia clinical trials.

Stacey A Fedewa, Leonard A Valentino, Andee Koo, Lorraine Cafuir, Duc Q Tran, Ana Antun, Christine L Kempton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Race, Ethnicity, and Hemophilia: A Scoping Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Global patterns of hemophilia drug trials, hemophilia care, and health care measures.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stacey A FedewaDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-3624-6382
Leonard A ValentinoRush University Hemophilia and Thrombophilia Center, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-7927-6418
Andee KooDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Lorraine CafuirDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Duc Q TranHemophilia of Georgia, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-6347-4452
Ana AntunDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Christine L KemptonDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-2391-2016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractRacial and ethnic representativeness in clinical trials is crucial to mitigate disparities in outcomes; however, diversity among hemophilia trials is unknown. The aim of this study is to examine the reporting and representation of race and ethnicity in trials of people with hemophilia (PwH). In this cross-sectional study, the ClinicalTrials.gov database was queried in April 2023 for interventional clinical trials involving PwH between 2007 and 2022. The distribution of participants (observed) was compared with expected proportions based on US Hemophilia Treatment Center (HTC) and country-specific census data with observed-to-expected ratios (OERs). Of 129 trials included, 94.6% were industry sponsored, with a mean of 62 participants and mean age of 26.8 years. Overall, 52.0% (n = 66) of trials reported data on race and ethnicity, increasing from 13.9% in 2007-2012 to 22.5% in 2013-2016 to 100% in 2017-2022 (P = .001). Among these 66 trials, 65.8%, 22.8%, 5.1%, 3.9% of participants were White, Asian, Hispanic, and Black, respectively. OERs were 10% to 20% lower for White participants vs US HTC, and US, UK, and Canadian census populations and ∼75% lower for Black or Hispanic participants when compared with US HTC and US census population. OERs for Asian participants were 1.6 to 3 times higher than Canada, US, and UK census populations. The reporting of race and ethnicity in hemophilia trials has drastically improved; however, Black and Hispanic PwH remain especially underrepresented. To address these disparities, stakeholders across the clinical trial enterprise need to implement strategies to ensure equitable participation.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicEthnicityHemophilia AAdultAsianAsian PeopleBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesHispanic or LatinoHumansRacial GroupsUnited KingdomUnited StatesWhite

Identifiers

PMID38547444
PMCPMC11127208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.