Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38547422›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2024

Toward Informed Selection and Interpretation of Clinical Genomic Tests in Prostate Cancer.

Gillian Vandekerkhove, Veda N Giri, Susan Halabi, Christopher McNair, Khaldoun Hamade, Rhonda L Bitting, Alexander W Wyatt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolution of AR and Non-AR Alterations in ctDNA of Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Treated in the Phase III Alliance A031201 Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Advances in the management of localized bladder cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Liquid Biopsy in the Clinical Management of Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gillian VandekerkhoveVancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5606-0908
Veda N GiriYale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.ORCID 0000-0002-7268-5913
Susan HalabiDuke University, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-2777
Christopher McNairThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-3204-8482
Khaldoun HamadeThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-8019-1526
Rhonda L BittingDuke University, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-5253-0551
Alexander W WyattVancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2399-0329
Duke University · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical genomic testing of patient germline, tumor tissue, or plasma cell-free DNA can enable a personalized approach to cancer management and treatment. In prostate cancer (PCa), broad genotyping tests are now widely used to identify germline and/or somatic alterations in

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsGenes, BRCA2GenomicsHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID38547422
PMCPMC10994438
OpenAlexW4393282851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.