Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38547210›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Using simulation to teach nursing students how to deal with a euthanasia request.

Dennis Demedts, Jürgen Magerman, Ellen Goossens, Sandra Tricas-Sauras, Johan Bilsen, Stefaan De Smet, Maaike Fobelets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dennis DemedtsBrussels Expertise Centre for Healthcare Innovation (BruCHI), Erasmus Brussels University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6667-4855
Jürgen MagermanResearch Collective EQUALITY, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Ghent, Belgium.
Ellen GoossensSchool of Healthcare, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Ghent, Belgium.
Sandra Tricas-SaurasBrussels Expertise Centre for Healthcare Innovation (BruCHI), Erasmus Brussels University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Brussels, Belgium.
Johan BilsenResearch group Mental Health and Wellbeing, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Stefaan De SmetResearch Centre SUPRB, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7321-6353
Maaike FobeletsBrussels Expertise Centre for Healthcare Innovation (BruCHI), Erasmus Brussels University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nursing students are confronted with euthanasia during their internship and certainly during their later career but they feel inadequately prepared in dealing with a euthanasia request. This study presents a simulation module focused on euthanasia and evaluates nursing students' perceptions after they have completed the simulation practice. The 'euthanasia module' consisted of a preparatory online learning module, a good-practice video, an in-vivo simulation scenario, and a debriefing session. The module's content was validated by four experts in end-of-life care. The module was completed by three groups of students from two different University Colleges (n = 17 in total). The students were divided into three groups: one with no previous simulation education experience, one with all students having previous experience, and another with a mix of experiences. After completing the entire module, each group had a discussion regarding their perceptions and expectations concerning this simulation module. Thematic content analysis was conducted on audio-recorded group interviews using NVIVO® software, involving initial open coding, transformation into specific themes and subthemes through axial coding, and defining core themes through selective coding, with data analysis continuing until data saturation was reached. Students generally found the online learning module valuable for background information, had mixed perceptions of the good-practice video, and appreciated the well-crafted scenarios with the taboo of euthanasia emerging during simulations, while the debriefing process was seen as enhancing clinical reasoning abilities. Students considered the simulation module a valuable addition to their education and nursing careers, expressing their satisfaction with the comprehensive coverage of the sensitive topic presented without sensationalism or taboos. This subject holds significance for nations with established euthanasia laws and those lacking such legal frameworks. The findings of this study can aid teachers in developing and accessing euthanasia simulation training programs, contributing to broader education's emphasis on integrating euthanasia-related knowledge and skills.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateEuthanasiaSimulation TrainingStudents, NursingClinical CompetenceHumansPersonal Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38547210
PMCPMC10977752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.