Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38547104›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

The effect of cooperator recognition on competition among clones in spatially structured microbial communities.

Adrienna Bingham, Aparajita Sur, Leah B Shaw, Helen A Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adrienna BinghamDepartment of Applied Science, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, United States of America.
Aparajita SurDepartment of Mathematics, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5691-9268
Leah B ShawDepartment of Mathematics, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, United States of America.
Helen A MurphyDepartment of Biology, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4363-4543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spatially structured microbial communities, clonal growth of stationary cells passively generates clusters of related individuals. This can lead to stable cooperation without the need for recognition mechanisms. However, recent research suggests that some biofilm-forming microbes may have mechanisms of kin recognition. To explore this unexpected observation, we studied the effects of different types of cooperation in a microbial colony using spatially explicit, agent-based simulations of two interacting strains. We found scenarios that favor a form of kin recognition in spatially structured microbial communities. In the presence of a "cheater" strain, a strain with greenbeard cooperation was able to increase in frequency more than a strain with obligate cooperation. This effect was most noticeable in high density colonies and when the cooperators were not as abundant as the cheaters. We also studied whether a polychromatic greenbeard, in which cells only cooperate with their own type, could provide a numerical benefit beyond a simple, binary greenbeard. We found the greatest benefit to a polychromatic greenbeard when cooperation is highly effective. These results suggest that in some ecological scenarios, recognition mechanisms may be beneficial even in spatially structured communities.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationMicrobiotaBiological EvolutionClone CellsHumans

Identifiers

PMID38547104
PMCPMC10977701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.