Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38547065›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Brain decoding of spontaneous thought: Predictive modeling of self-relevance and valence using personal narratives.

Hong Ji Kim, Byeol Kim Lux, Eunjin Lee, Emily S Finn, Choong-Wan Woo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Real-time fMRI-triggered experience-sampling: a proof-of-concept study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Brain decoding of spontaneous thought: Predictive modeling of self-relevance and valence using personal narratives.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Individual variability in neural representations of mind-wandering.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hong Ji KimCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon 16419, South Korea.ORCID 0009-0000-7620-5414
Byeol Kim LuxCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon 16419, South Korea.
Eunjin LeeCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon 16419, South Korea.
Emily S FinnDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, NH 03755.ORCID 0000-0001-8591-3068
Choong-Wan WooCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon 16419, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7423-5422

Funding

Institute for Basic Sciences IBS-R015-D1National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2021M3E5D2A01022515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contents and dynamics of spontaneous thought are important factors for personality traits and mental health. However, assessing spontaneous thoughts is challenging due to their unconstrained nature, and directing participants' attention to report their thoughts may fundamentally alter them. Here, we aimed to decode two key content dimensions of spontaneous thought-self-relevance and valence-directly from brain activity. To train functional MRI-based predictive models, we used individually generated personal stories as stimuli in a story-reading task to mimic narrative-like spontaneous thoughts (

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingEmotionsGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal Cortexaffective neurosciencebrain decodingfunctional magnetic resonance imagingpersonal storyspontaneous thought

Identifiers

PMID38547065
PMCPMC10998624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.