SynthesisTargeted oncology2024
Palbociclib in Older Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Targeted oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of CDK4/6i in elderly and BIPOC patients with HR+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer: an updated systematic literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and tolerability of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in HR-positive HER2-negative de novo metastatic breast cancer patients aged ≥ 70 years.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical Applications of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in HR+/HER2, and Personalized Treatment Strategies: A Narrative Review.Oncology research · 2026Review
- A Decade After Approval of the First CDK4/6 Inhibitor: A Look Back at Palbociclib's Journey from Discovery to Approval and What's Next in CDK Inhibition in Breast Cancer.Targeted oncology · 2025Review
- CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Patients Aged 80 and Older with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Surface functionalized albumin nanoparticles of palbociclib with amplified brain delivery for treating brain glioblastoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact of age and comorbidities on real-world outcomes in advanced breast cancer patients treated with palbociclib in first line: a nation-wide Danish retrospective study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Observational
- Overall Survival With Palbociclib and Aromatase Inhibitor Versus Aromatase Inhibitor Alone in Older Patients With HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Observational
- Real-world effectiveness of CDK4/6i in first-line treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer: updated systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Real-World Outcomes of First-Line Palbociclib Plus Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer in Japan: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Oncology research · 2025Article
- Article
- Palbociclib as an Antitumor Drug: A License to Kill.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPalbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy is approved for treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. In addition to clinical trials, several real-world studies have evaluated the effectiveness of palbociclib. With increased life expectancy in the general population, breast cancer in older women is also expected to increase.
objectiveThe aim was to systematically review evidence from both clinical trials and real-world studies for palbociclib treatment outcomes in older patients with HR+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer (a/mBC). Older patients are often underrepresented in clinical trials, and real-world evidence (RWE) will enrich the analysis of palbociclib outcomes in this subgroup of patients.
designA systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library through May 4, 2023, yielded 2355 unique articles. A total of 52 articles (13 and 39 articles reporting results from seven randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 37 RWE studies, respectively) were included based on study eligibility criteria.
resultsAll RCTs used age cutoffs of ≥ 65 years to define older population (n = 722; 437 received palbociclib); all RWE studies, except one with an age cutoff of > 60 years, had age cutoffs of ≥ 65 years or higher to define older population (n = 9840; 7408 received palbociclib). Overall, in studies that compared efficacy (progression-free survival [seven RCTs, 20 RWE studies], overall survival [four RCTs, 11 RWE studies], tumor response [three RWE studies], and clinical benefit rate [one RCT, two RWE studies]) and safety outcomes (three RCTs, three RWE studies) between older and younger patients, palbociclib showed similar benefits, regardless of age. Results from two RCTs and two RWE studies showed that global quality of life (QoL) was maintained in older patients receiving palbociclib. Overall, palbociclib dose modifications (two RWE studies), dose reductions (one RCT, seven RWE studies), and treatment discontinuation rates (three RCTs, three RWE studies) were higher in older patients compared with younger patients; however, these differences did not appear to adversely impact efficacy outcomes.
conclusionsIn this systematic review, data from RCTs showed that palbociclib was effective, well tolerated, and maintained QoL in older patients with HR+/HER2- a/mBC. Palbociclib treatment in older patients in real-world settings was associated with similar clinical benefit as in RCTs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023444195.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.