ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
Enzyme-labeled liquid-based cytology (ELLBC): a new noninvasive diagnostic method for bladder cancers.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence algorithms enhance urine cytology reporting confidence in postoperative follow-up for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBased on liquid-based cytology, we performed an enzyme histochemical staining using acid phosphatase as a marker and termed it ELLBC. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of ELLBC in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.
methodsFifty patients who were initially diagnosed with suspected bladder cancers (hematuria or bladder irritation symptoms, urinary ultrasound suggestive of bladder mass) at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Anhui, China) from January 2022 to December 2022 were selected as the study subjects, all of whom underwent ELLBC, CC, and histopathology Histopathology was used as the gold standard to calculate the diagnostic efficacy of ELLBC, CC and ELLBC combined with CC in bladder cancer.
resultsHistopathological examination revealed 35 positive cases in 50 patients, including 15 cases of high-grade uroepithelial carcinoma (HGUC) and 20 cases of low-grade uroepithelial carcinoma (LGUC.) The sensitivity of ELLBC was 82.86%, the specificity was 93.33%, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 96.67%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 70.00%, and the accuracy was 86.00%; CC had a sensitivity of 37.14%, specificity of 80.00%, PPV of 81.25%, NPV of 35.29%, and accuracy of 50%; ELLBC combined with CC had a sensitivity of 88.57%, specificity of 73.33%, PPV of 88.57%, NPV of 73.33%, and accuracy of 84.00%. The sensitivity and specificity of ELLBC were higher than that of CC, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05), ELLBC combined with CC achieved higher sensitivity, but the diagnostic accuracy decreased. For clinical staging, the diagnostic accuracy was 86.36% for ELLBC and 40.91% for CC in patients in Stage I, and 90.91% for ELLBC and 36.36% for CC in patients in Stage II.
conclusionELLBC has high clinical application value for the diagnosis of bladder cancer and can provide new options and methods for the early screening of bladder cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.