Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38546864›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2024

[Artificial intelligence in intensive care medicine].

André Baumgart, Grietje Beck, David Ghezel-Ahmadi

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

André BaumgartZentrum für Präventivmedizin und Digitale Gesundheit, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland. andre.baumgart@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5283-5566
Grietje BeckAbteilung für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim gGmbH, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6722-9370
David Ghezel-AhmadiAbteilung für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim gGmbH, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6603-368X
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into intensive care medicine has made considerable progress in recent studies, particularly in the areas of predictive analytics, early detection of complications, and the development of decision support systems. The main challenges remain availability and quality of data, reduction of bias and the need for explainable results from algorithms and models. Methods to explain these systems are essential to increase trust, understanding, and ethical considerations among healthcare professionals and patients. Proper training of healthcare professionals in AI principles, terminology, ethical considerations, and practical application is crucial for the successful use of AI. Careful assessment of the impact of AI on patient autonomy and data protection is essential for its responsible use in intensive care medicine. A balance between ethical and practical considerations must be maintained to ensure patient-centered care while complying with data protection regulations. Synergistic collaboration between clinicians, AI engineers, and regulators is critical to realizing the full potential of AI in intensive care medicine and maximizing its positive impact on patient care. Future research and development efforts should focus on improving AI models for real-time predictions, increasing the accuracy and utility of AI-based closed-loop systems, and overcoming ethical, technical, and regulatory challenges, especially in generative AI systems.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMedicineAlgorithmsCritical CareHealth PersonnelHumansClinical decision-supportInformation managementInformation scienceMaschine LearningNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID38546864
OpenAlexW4393259565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.