SynthesisWorld journal of urology2024
Follow-up of urolithiasis patients after treatment: an algorithm from the EAU Urolithiasis Panel.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Residual stone fragments: systematic review of definitions, diagnostic standards.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of explainable machine learning models for predicting mid-term stone recurrence after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.International urology and nephrology · 2026Observational
- Exploring key factors affecting stone retention rates in percutaneous nephrolithotomy from a three-dimensional structural perspective: a retrospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Forecasting Stone-Free Status Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Utilizing Explainable Machine Learning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Ureteroscopy for stone disease in the elderly (≥ 80 years): Outcomes of a multicentre study from YAU and EAU endourology groups.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Ureteroscopy vs Shockwave Lithotripsy to Remove Kidney Stones in Children and Adolescents: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Observational
- Impact of flow rate and ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter on stone removal in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: in vitro and CFD analyses insights.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Breaking the stone and beating the bug: managing ureterolithiasis withArchive of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Comment on "Comparison of the bone mineral density status of patients with kidney stones stratified by stone composition".World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Recurrent Urinary Stone Formers: Imaging Assessment and Endoscopic Treatment Strategies: A Systematic Search and Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Aspiration-Assisted Nephrostomic Access Sheaths in PCNL and Intrarenal Pressures Evaluation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a follow-up algorithm for urinary stone patients after definitive treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe panel performed a systematic review on follow-up of urinary stone patients after treatment (PROSPERO: CRD42020205739). Given the lack of comparative studies we critically evaluated the literature and reached a consensus on the follow-up scheme.
resultsA total of 76 studies were included in the analysis, including 17 RCTs. In the stone-free general population group, 71-100% of patients are stone-free at 12 months while 29-94% remain stone-free at 36 months. We propose counselling these patients on imaging versus discharge after the first year. The stone-free rate in high-risk patients not receiving targeted medical therapy is < 40% at 36 months, a fact that supports imaging, metabolic, and treatment monitoring follow-up once a year. Patients with residual fragments ≤ 4 mm have a spontaneous expulsion rate of 18-47% and a growth rate of 10-41% at 12 months, supporting annual imaging follow-up. Patients with residual fragments > 4 mm should be considered for surgical re-intervention based on the low spontaneous expulsion rate (13% at 1 year) and high risk of recurrence. Plain film KUB and/or kidney ultrasonography based on clinicians' preference and stone characteristics is the preferred imaging follow-up. Computed tomography should be considered if patient is symptomatic or intervention is planned.
conclusionsBased on evidence from the systematic review we propose, for the first time, a follow-up algorithm for patients after surgical stone treatment balancing the risks of stone recurrence against the burden of radiation from imaging studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38546854What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.