Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38546826›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Histogram analysis of MR quantitative parameters: are they correlated with prognostic factors in prostate cancer?

Yanling Chen, Tiebao Meng, Wenxin Cao, Weijing Zhang, Jian Ling, Zhihua Wen, Long Qian, Yan Guo, Jinhua Lin, Huanjun Wang

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantitative Prostate MRI, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanling Chen *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Tiebao Meng *Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wenxin Cao *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Weijing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jian LingDepartment of Radiology, The Eastern Hospital of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.183 Huangpu Eastern Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhihua WenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Long QianMR Research, GE Healthcare, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yan GuoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. gyan@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Jinhua LinDivision of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. linjh53@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Huanjun WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. wanghj45@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-7736
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82071989National Natural Science Foundation of China 82371911National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the correlation between quantitative MR parameters and prognostic factors in prostate cancer (PCa).

methodA total of 186 patients with pathologically confirmed PCa who underwent preoperative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), including synthetic MRI (SyMRI), were enrolled from two medical centers. The histogram metrics of SyMRI [T1, T2, proton density (PD)] and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were extracted. The Mann‒Whitney U test or Student's t test was employed to determine the association between these histogram features and the prognostically relevant factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the differentiation performance. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlations between histogram parameters and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group as well as pathological T stage.

resultsSignificant correlations were found between the histogram parameters and the ISUP grade as well as pathological T stage of PCa. Among these histogram parameters, ADC_minimum had the strongest correlation with the ISUP grade (r = - 0.481, p < 0.001), and ADC_Median showed the strongest association with pathological T stage (r = - 0.285, p = 0.008). The ADC_10th percentile exhibited the highest performance in identifying clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (AUC 0.833; 95% CI 0.771-0.883). When discriminating between the status of different prognostically relevant factors, a significant difference was observed between extraprostatic extension-positive and -negative cancers with regard to histogram parameters of the ADC map (10th percentile, 90th percentile, mean, median, minimum) and T1 map (minimum) (p = 0.002-0.032). Moreover, histogram parameters of the ADC map (90th percentile, maximum, mean, median), T2 map (10th percentile, median), and PD map (10th percentile, median) were significantly lower in PCa with perineural invasion (p = 0.009-0.049). The T2 values were significantly lower in patients with seminal vesicle invasion (minimum, p = 0.036) and positive surgical margin (10th percentile, 90th percentile, mean, median, and minimum, p = 0.015-0.025).

conclusionQuantitative histogram parameters derived from synthetic MRI and ADC maps may have great potential for predicting the prognostic features of PCa.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesApparent diffusion coefficientHistogram analysisPrognosisProstate cancerSynthetic MRI

Identifiers

PMID38546826
OpenAlexW4393259680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.