ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Diagnostic value of dual-time point
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel therapeutic strategies for metastatic castration‑resistant prostate cancer: Beyond androgen receptor pathway inhibition (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Dynamic FDG PET/CT imaging: quantitative assessment, advantages and application in the diagnosis of malignant solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to ascertain the diagnostic efficacy of routine
methodsA retrospective assessment was undertaken on 44 prostate cancer patients who had undergone both routine and delayed
resultsThe study encompassed 44 patients, presenting 35 primary prostate cancer lesions, 44 metastatic lesions, and 30 benign lesions. Delayed imaging (3 h post-injection) demonstrated a decreasing trend in the SUVmax and SUVmean for the liver, blood, and spleen. Conversely, an increasing trend was observed for the parotid, lacrimal, and submandibular glands. For primary lesions, the SUVmax and SUVmean values were 17.63 ± 9.61 and 9.77 ± 5.18 during routine imaging, and 25.09 ± 15.11 and 14.05 ± 8.02 (P < 0.001) during delayed imaging. A comparable increase in SUVmax and SUVmean was seen in the delayed images for metastatic lesions when juxtaposed with routine images. Nevertheless, benign lesions displayed a decrease in SUVmax and SUVmean during delayed imaging when set against routine imaging (SUVmax: 3.56 ± 1.49 vs 2.93 ± 1.47, P = 0.001; SUVmean: 1.99 ± 0.87 vs 1.65 ± 0.87, P = 0.003).
conclusionImaging using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.