Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38546733›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

High-Flow Humidified Oxygen as an Early Intervention in Children With Acute Severe Asthma: Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hector Rojas-Anaya, Akshat Kapur, Graham Roberts, Damian Roland, Atul Gupta, Michaela Lazner, Jane Bayreuther, John Pappachan, Christina Jones, Stephen Bremner and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hector Rojas-AnayaUniversity Hospitals Sussex National Health Service Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7817-8720
Akshat KapurRespiratory Care, Royal Alexandra Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex National Health Service Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1772-9300
Graham RobertsDepartment of Paediatric Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-1248
Damian RolandPaediatric Emergency Medicine Leicester Academic Group, Children's Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9334-5144
Atul GuptaPaediatric Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1610-0335
Michaela LaznerChildren's Emergency Department, Royal Alexandra Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex National Health Service Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2194-8659
Jane BayreutherChildren's Emergency Department, University Hospital Southampton National Health Service Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4069-8250
John PappachanNational Institute for Heath Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton National Health Service Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3559-0595
Christina JonesSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3672-6631
Stephen BremnerBrighton and Sussex Clinical Trials Unit, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0790-7070
Fleur CantleEmergency Department, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0720-1035
Paul SeddonRespiratory Care, Royal Alexandra Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex National Health Service Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2136-958X
National Health Service · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBKing's College Hospital · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute severe asthma (ASA) is a leading cause of hospital attendance in children. Standard first-line therapy consists of high-dose inhaled bronchodilators plus oral corticosteroids. Treatment for children who fail to respond to first-line therapy is problematic: the use of intravenous agents is inconsistent, and side effects are frequent. High-flow humidified oxygen (HiFlo) is widely used in respiratory conditions and is increasingly being used in ASA, but with little evidence for its effectiveness. A well-designed, adequately powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) of HiFlo therapy in ASA is urgently needed, and feasibility data are required to plan such an RCT. In this study, we describe the protocol for a feasibility study designed to fill this knowledge gap.

objectiveThis study aims to establish whether a full RCT of early HiFlo therapy in children with ASA can be conducted successfully and safely, to establish whether recruitment using deferred consent is practicable, and to define appropriate outcome measures and sample sizes for a definitive RCT. The underlying hypothesis is that early HiFlo therapy in ASA will reduce the need for more invasive treatments, allow faster recovery and discharge from hospital, and in both these ways reduce distress to children and their families.

methodsWe conducted a feasibility RCT with deferred consent to assess the use of early HiFlo therapy in children aged 2 to 11 years with acute severe wheeze not responding to burst therapy (ie, high-dose inhaled salbutamol with or without ipratropium). Children with a Preschool Respiratory Assessment Measure score ≥5 after burst therapy were randomized to commence HiFlo therapy or follow standard care. The candidate primary outcomes assessed were treatment failure requiring escalation and time to meet hospital discharge criteria. Patient and parent experiences were also assessed using questionnaires and telephone interviews.

resultsThe trial was opened to recruitment in February 2020 but was paused for 15 months owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. The trial was reopened at the lead site in July 2021 and opened at the other 3 sites from August to December 2022. Recruitment was completed in June 2023.

conclusionsThis feasibility RCT of early HiFlo therapy in children with ASA recruited to the target despite major disturbances owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. The data are currently being analyzed and will be published separately.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry ISRCTN78297040; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN78297040. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/54081.

Indexed as

asthmachildhigh-flow humidified oxygen therapyoxygen therapywheezing

Identifiers

PMID38546733
PMCPMC11009849
OpenAlexW4391225983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.