Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38546714›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2024

Social Media Use in Dermatology in Turkey: Challenges and Tips for Patient Health.

Ayse Serap Karadag, Basak Kandi, Berna Sanlı, Hande Ulusal, Hasan Basusta, Seray Sener, Sinem Calıka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Social media use and perceptions among pathologists in Turkey: a national survey.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ayse Serap Karadag *Department of Dermatology, Medical School of Istanbul Arel University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4333-8274
Basak Kandi *Private Clinic, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1414-5043
Berna Sanlı *Department of Dermatology, Medical School of Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7119-0302
Hande Ulusal *Department of Dermatology, Medical School of Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1849-8279
Hasan Basusta *Başusta Training and Consultancy, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9941-687X
Seray Sener *Pfizer Biopharmaceuticals, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2766-8152
Sinem Calıka *Pfizer Biopharmaceuticals, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2472-1381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media has established its place in our daily lives, especially with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic. It has become the leading source of information for dermatological literacy on various topics, ranging from skin diseases to everyday skincare and cosmetic purposes in the present digital era. Accumulated evidence indicates that accurate medical content constitutes only a tiny fraction of the exponentially growing dermatological information on digital platforms, highlighting an unmet patient need for access to evidence-based information on social media. However, there have been no recent local publications from Turkey analyzing and assessing the key elements in raising dermatological literacy and awareness in digital communication for patients. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first collaborative work between health care professionals and a social media specialist in the medical literature. Furthermore, it represents the first author-initiated implementation science attempt focusing on the use of social media in addressing dermatological problems, with the primary end point of increasing health literacy and patient benefits. The multidisciplinary expert panel was formed by 4 dermatologists with academic credentials and significant influence in public health and among patients on digital platforms. A social media specialist, who serves as a guest lecturer on "How social media works" at Istanbul Technical University, Turkey, was invited to the panel as an expert on digital communication. The panel members had a kickoff meeting to establish the context for the discussion points. The context of the advisory board meeting was outlined under 5 headlines. Two weeks later, the panel members presented their social media account statistics, defined the main characteristics of dermatology patients on social media, and discussed their experiences with patients on digital platforms. These discussions were organized under the predefined headlines and in line with the current literature. We aimed to collect expert opinions on identifying the main characteristics of individuals interested in dermatological topics and to provide recommendations to help dermatologists increase evidence-based dermatological content on social media. Additionally, experts discussed paradigms for dermatological outreach and the role of dermatologists in reducing misleading information on digital platforms in Turkey. The main concluding remark of this study is that dermatologists should enhance their social media presence to increase evidence-based knowledge by applying the principles of patient-physician communication on digital platforms while maintaining a professional stance. To achieve this goal, dermatologists should share targeted scientific content after increasing their knowledge about the operational rules of digital channels. This includes correctly identifying the needs of those seeking information on social media and preparing a sustainable social media communication plan. This viewpoint reflects Turkish dermatologists' experiences with individuals searching for dermatological information on local digital platforms; therefore, the applicability of recommendations may be limited and should be carefully considered.

Indexed as

cosmeticsdermatologydigital communicationhealth promotionInstagraminternetmisinformationonline social networkingpatient educationpatient healthskinskincareskin diseasesocial mediasocial networkingTurkeyYouTube

Identifiers

PMID38546714
PMCPMC11009853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.