ArticleThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2024
Retraction: 'ASPM predicts poor prognosis and regulates cell proliferation in bladder cancer'. Zhen-Ya Gao, Fang Yu, Huan-Xia Jia, Zhuo Ye, Shi-Jie Yao, Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2020; 36: 1021-1029 (https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.12284).
Article in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The above article, published online on 06 August 2020, in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors, the journal Editor-in-Chief, Wan-Long Chuang, and John Wiley and Sons Australia, Ltd. The retraction has been agreed due to a high degree of similarity and duplication of figures previously published in five identified articles. The authors are unable to determine how the images published were copies of figures from other articles. Following the investigation by the Editors, the conclusions of this article are considered unreliable due to the high degree of duplication and the questionable origin of the data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.