Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38546203›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Task-anchored grid cell firing is selectively associated with successful path integration-dependent behaviour.

Harry Clark, Matthew F Nolan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Harry ClarkCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain, Hugh Robson Building, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9843-0276
Matthew F NolanCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain, Hugh Robson Building, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1062-6501
Discovery Centre · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S502479/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust https://doi.org/10.35802/200855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grid firing fields have been proposed as a neural substrate for spatial localisation in general or for path integration in particular. To distinguish these possibilities, we investigate firing of grid and non-grid cells in the mouse medial entorhinal cortex during a location memory task. We find that grid firing can either be anchored to the task environment, or can encode distance travelled independently of the task reference frame. Anchoring varied between and within sessions, while spatial firing of non-grid cells was either coherent with the grid population, or was stably anchored to the task environment. We took advantage of the variability in task-anchoring to evaluate whether and when encoding of location by grid cells might contribute to behaviour. We find that when reward location is indicated by a visual cue, performance is similar regardless of whether grid cells are task-anchored or not, arguing against a role for grid representations when location cues are available. By contrast, in the absence of the visual cue, performance was enhanced when grid cells were anchored to the task environment. Our results suggest that anchoring of grid cells to task reference frames selectively enhances performance when path integration is required.

Indexed as

CuesEntorhinal CortexAction PotentialsAnimalsMiceModels, NeurologicalSpace Perceptionentorhinal cortexgrid cellmouseneurosciencespatial cognitionspatial memory

Identifiers

PMID38546203
PMCPMC10977970
OpenAlexW4384666571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.