Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38546118›Full record

Observational studyJBRA assisted reproduction2024

Intrauterine insemination: prognostic factors.

Carla Maria Franco Dias, Gabriel Borges Tavares Vitorino, Suelen Maria Parizotto Furlan, Rosana Maria Dos Reis, Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa E Silva, Maria Célia Mendes, Rui Alberto Ferriani, Paula Andrea Navarro

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimizing outcomes in intrauterine insemination: A narrative synthesis of two decades of clinical research (2000-2024).International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carla Maria Franco DiasSector of Human Reproduction, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriel Borges Tavares VitorinoSector of Human Reproduction, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Suelen Maria Parizotto FurlanSector of Human Reproduction, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Rosana Maria Dos ReisSector of Human Reproduction, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa E SilvaSector of Human Reproduction, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Célia MendesSector of Human Reproduction, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Rui Alberto FerrianiSector of Human Reproduction, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Paula Andrea NavarroSector of Human Reproduction, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of possible maternal and paternal prognostic factors and ovarian stimulation protocols on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles.

methodsRetrospective observational study of 341 IUI cycles performed from January 2016 to November 2020 at the Assisted Reproduction Service of the Clinics Hospital of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates and their potential prognostic factors were evaluated. Wilcoxon's non-parametric test was used to compare quantitative variables, and the chi-square test to compare qualitative variables, adopting a significance level of p<0.05. A logistic regression model was performed to verify which exploratory variables are predictive factors for pregnancy outcome.

resultsThe ovulation induction protocol using gonadotropins plus letrozole (p=0.0097; OR 4.3286, CI 1.3040 - 14.3684) and post-capacitation progressive sperm ≥ 5million/mL (p=0.0253) showed a statistically significant correlation with the live birth rate. Female and male age, etiology of infertility, obesity, multifollicular growth, endometrial thickness ≥ 7 mm, and time between human chorionic gonadotropin administration and IUI performance were not associated with the primary outcomes. In the group of patients with ideal characteristics (women aged< 40 years, BMI < 30 kg/m2, antral follicle count ≥ 5, partner aged< 45 years, and post-capacitation semen with progressive spermatozoa ≥ 5 million/mL), the rate of clinical pregnancy was 14.8%, while that of live birth, 9.9%.

conclusionsIn this study, the ovulation induction protocol with gonadotropins plus letrozole and post-capacitation progressive sperm ≥ 5 million/mL were the only variables that significantly correlated with intrauterine insemination success.

Indexed as

Insemination, ArtificialOvulation InductionAdultFemaleHumansMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RatePrognosisRetrospective Studiesclinical pregnancy rateinfertilityintrauterine inseminationlive birth rateprognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID38546118
PMCPMC11152422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.