ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024
Evaluation of the Cutoff Point and Diagnostic Value of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting Ovarian Cancer Compared to Pathological Findings.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Ovarian cancer: Diagnosis and treatment strategies (Review).Oncology letters · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis research aims to establish a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) threshold and evaluate its diagnostic accuracy compared to pathological criteria for diagnosing Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC).
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study at Imam Hossein Hospital involving 204 women aged 18 and older with confirmed ovarian mass based on pathology. We recorded clinical, pathological, and preoperative blood count data, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Patients were categorized into malignant and benign ovarian mass groups based on postoperative pathology. The power of NLR to diagnosis of EOC was evaluated using ROC curve.
resultsAt total, 204 patients (Benign 75.5% vs. Malignant 24.5%) were included in the analysis with mean age of 54.26 ±12.04 yrs in malignant and 46.31±13.21 in benign. In all cases, the proportion of patients with the following tumor markers HE4 (>140 Pm), CA 125 (> 35U/Ml) and CEA (>5 ng/Ml) were 52.45%, 41.67% and 3.43%, respectively, and proportion of abnormal tumor markers was statistically higher in malignant group compared to benign mass (p <0.05). Odds of having higher NLR levels in the malignancy group was higher than benign group (e.g., OR of 4.45 for NLR in quartile 4 vs. quartile 1). According to model selection criteria, the full model with including NLR level and age, BMI and tumor markers has best performance for diagnosis of malignancy (AUC =0.87).
conclusionHigh NLR in combination with tumor markers including CA125, HE4 and CEA were associated with malignancy in patients with ovarian mass. More attention and further examinations should be devoted for patients with ovarian mass having high NLR and abnormal tumor markers levels to detect the probable malignancy as soon as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.