Observational studyCancer medicine2024
Construction and validation of artificial intelligence pathomics models for predicting pathological staging in colorectal cancer: Using multimodal data and clinical variables.
Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predictive Performance of Radiomics-Based Machine Learning for Colorectal Cancer Recurrence Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Advancements in Image-Based Analyses for Morphology and Staging of Colon Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.BioMed research international · 2025Pooled it
- Dual modal pathomics model for colorectal cancer early recurrence prediction and mutation landscape analysis.iScience · 2026Article
- From classical machine learning to emerging foundation models: review on multimodal data integration for cancer research.Artificial intelligence review · 2026Article
- Construction of a novel prediction model based on albumin-hemoglobin score and serum microRNA-497-5p for prognosis of patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Nomograms for predicting survival of elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a secondary analysis of the CCTG CE.6 trial.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction: current applications and emerging opportunities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Multimodal analysis of whole slide images in colorectal cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of radiopathomics models for predicting molecular subtypes and WHO grades in adult-type diffuse gliomas: a multicenter study.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Advancing Colorectal Cancer Diagnostics from Barium Enema to AI-Assisted Colonoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating CT radiomics and clinical data with machine learning to predict fibrosis progression in coalworker pneumoconiosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Establishment of two pathomic-based machine learning models to predict CLCA1 expression in colon adenocarcinoma.PloS one · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of artificial intelligence pathomics models for predicting pathological staging in colorectal cancer: Using multimodal data and clinical variables.Cancer medicine · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis retrospective observational study aims to develop and validate artificial intelligence (AI) pathomics models based on pathological Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) slides and pathological immunohistochemistry (Ki67) slides for predicting the pathological staging of colorectal cancer. The goal is to enable AI-assisted accurate pathological staging, supporting healthcare professionals in making efficient and precise staging assessments.
methodsThis study included a total of 267 colorectal cancer patients (training cohort: n = 213; testing cohort: n = 54). Logistic regression algorithms were used to construct the models. The HE image features were used to build the HE model, the Ki67 image features were used for the Ki67 model, and the combined model included features from both the HE and Ki67 images, as well as tumor markers (CEA, CA724, CA125, and CA242). The predictive results of the HE model, Ki67 model, and tumor markers were visualized through a nomogram. The models were evaluated using ROC curve analysis, and their clinical value was estimated using decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsA total of 260 deep learning features were extracted from HE or Ki67 images. The AUC for the HE model and Ki67 model in the training cohort was 0.885 and 0.890, and in the testing cohort, it was 0.703 and 0.767, respectively. The combined model and nomogram in the training cohort had AUC values of 0.907 and 0.926, and in the testing cohort, they had AUC values of 0.814 and 0.817. In clinical DCA, the net benefit of the Ki67 model was superior to the HE model. The combined model and nomogram showed significantly higher net benefits compared to the individual HE model or Ki67 model.
conclusionThe combined model and nomogram, which integrate pathomics multi-modal data and clinical-pathological variables, demonstrated superior performance in distinguishing between Stage I-II and Stage III colorectal cancer. This provides valuable support for clinical decision-making and may improve treatment strategies and patient prognosis. Furthermore, the use of immunohistochemistry (Ki67) slides for pathomics modeling outperformed HE slide, offering new insights for future pathomics research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.