Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38545828›Full record

Observational studyCancer medicine2024

Construction and validation of artificial intelligence pathomics models for predicting pathological staging in colorectal cancer: Using multimodal data and clinical variables.

Yang Tan, Run Liu, Jia-Wen Xue, Zhenbo Feng

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yang TanDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2160-1169
Run LiuDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jia-Wen XueDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zhenbo FengDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis retrospective observational study aims to develop and validate artificial intelligence (AI) pathomics models based on pathological Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) slides and pathological immunohistochemistry (Ki67) slides for predicting the pathological staging of colorectal cancer. The goal is to enable AI-assisted accurate pathological staging, supporting healthcare professionals in making efficient and precise staging assessments.

methodsThis study included a total of 267 colorectal cancer patients (training cohort: n = 213; testing cohort: n = 54). Logistic regression algorithms were used to construct the models. The HE image features were used to build the HE model, the Ki67 image features were used for the Ki67 model, and the combined model included features from both the HE and Ki67 images, as well as tumor markers (CEA, CA724, CA125, and CA242). The predictive results of the HE model, Ki67 model, and tumor markers were visualized through a nomogram. The models were evaluated using ROC curve analysis, and their clinical value was estimated using decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsA total of 260 deep learning features were extracted from HE or Ki67 images. The AUC for the HE model and Ki67 model in the training cohort was 0.885 and 0.890, and in the testing cohort, it was 0.703 and 0.767, respectively. The combined model and nomogram in the training cohort had AUC values of 0.907 and 0.926, and in the testing cohort, they had AUC values of 0.814 and 0.817. In clinical DCA, the net benefit of the Ki67 model was superior to the HE model. The combined model and nomogram showed significantly higher net benefits compared to the individual HE model or Ki67 model.

conclusionThe combined model and nomogram, which integrate pathomics multi-modal data and clinical-pathological variables, demonstrated superior performance in distinguishing between Stage I-II and Stage III colorectal cancer. This provides valuable support for clinical decision-making and may improve treatment strategies and patient prognosis. Furthermore, the use of immunohistochemistry (Ki67) slides for pathomics modeling outperformed HE slide, offering new insights for future pathomics research.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceColorectal NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorEosine Yellowish-(YS)HumansKi-67 AntigenNomogramsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorEosine Yellowish-(YS)Ki-67 Antigenartificial intelligencecolorectal cancernomogrampathological stagingpathomics

Identifiers

PMID38545828
PMCPMC10974698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.