ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2024
Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: the perspectives of stakeholders.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- "The ability to get ahead": Australian parent perspectives on genomics in newborn screening and considerations for potential models of care.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- The Importance of Early Diagnosis and Treatment to Limit the Impact of Dystrophic Cardiomyopathy-We've Seen This Film Before, and We Didn't Like the Ending.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Synthetic bottlebrush block copolymer prevents disease onset in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Survival in Duchenne muscular dystrophy in Australia: a 50 year retrospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Burden of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in Australia: a scoping review.BMJ neurology open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rapidly evolving clinical landscape of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is driving innovative approaches for early diagnosis through genomic newborn bloodspot screening (NBS). However, the potential impact of these programs on families and healthcare systems remains unexplored. This study assessed the perceived benefits, harms, barriers, and enablers for DMD NBS amongst primary caregivers of children with DMD and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Methods: This Australian multi-centre cross-sectional study used a mixed-methods convergent methodology. Participants completed a codeveloped questionnaire and their perceptions on the utility, model of care, and processes of DMD NBS were thematically analysed. Findings: Participants included 50 caregivers and 26 HCPs (68.5% and 53.1% response rate respectively). Most caregivers (40/50, 80%) perceived net benefits of DMD NBS and highlighted an early diagnosis as actionable knowledge, even with the current paucity of disease modifying therapies. This knowledge was valued to enable access to multidisciplinary supportive care (29/50, 58%), clinical trials (27/50, 54%), psychological support (28/50, 56%), inform reproductive planning (27/50, 54%), and facilitate financial planning based on the future needs of their child (27/50, 54%). Whilst HCPs acknowledged these opportunities, only 16/26 (61.5%) believed there were definite net benefits, with notable concerns over the psychological harms of diagnostic knowledge without a recourse to disease modifying therapeutic intervention early in life. Interpretation: Caregivers and HCPs perceived a range of potential benefits of DMD NBS. Health system readiness will be founded on developing an integrated model of care that not only supports the psychosocial and information needs of families receiving a newborn diagnosis of DMD, but also provides care and clinical surveillance for individuals for whom a diagnosis may remain uncertain. Funding: Medical Research Futures fund (GNT2017165, MRF2015965).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.