ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2024
Single-Stage Free Flap Reconstruction Following Extremity Sarcoma Resection: a Regional Cancer Center Experience.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Clinical efficacy of thinned free flaps in reconstructing the wounds following excision of malignant extremity tumors].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Article
- Analysis of risk factors for complications after flap reconstruction of head and neck cancer and construction and validation of predictive models.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgery remains mainstay modality of treatment of STS of extremity. In majority of patients, primary closure is possible following surgical resection of the tumor. Primary closure of wound may not be feasible in tumors with large area of skin involvement and sometimes following a whoops procedure. We analyzed postoperative complications and oncological outcomes in patients who underwent free flap reconstruction. Thirty-seven patients who required a free flap for reconstruction of the defect following resection of the STS were included in the study. There were 26 men and 11 women with a mean age of 40 years. Seventy-three percent tumors were in lower limb; 62% patients had undergone a whoops procedure elsewhere. Flaps were fasciocutaneous in 19, myocutaneous in 15, and free muscle transfers in 3 patients. Seventeen patients had early surgical site complications. Nine patients had early flap failures. Of the 9, 6 patients had total loss of flap and in 3 the flaps were salvaged. Two patients had partial loss (< 50% of total area) of flap. Four patients had edge necrosis and two had suture diastasis. Nine patients had late surgical site complications. Four had post-radiotherapy wound dehiscence. Late SSI was noted in two. Late joint contracture and chronic lymphedema was seen in one patient each. One died due to sepsis. Statistically significant association was not found between patient, tumor or treatment-related factors and complications or flap failures. Mean duration of surgery was 7.73 h. Twenty-three patients required multiple surgeries due to complications. Mean time to initiate adjuvant therapy from the date of surgery was 47 days. Mean OS of the group was 67 ± 7.3 months. Mean RFS was 58 ± 7.8 months. Single-stage free flap reconstruction following surgical resection of extremity sarcoma is a viable option of reconstruction while salvaging the limb. Though associated with high rate of early surgical site complications, they are manageable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.