Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38545571›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2024

Grade 3 Proximal Humerus Giant Cell Tumour: Is Resection and Reconstruction with Prosthesis a Valuable Option?

Arun John Paul, Vijay T K Titus

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arun John PaulOrthopaedic Surgeon, Mure Memorial Hospital, Nagpur, 440001 Maharashtra India.ORCID 0000-0002-1921-4290
Vijay T K TitusFellowship in Orthopaedic Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Christian Medical College, Vellore · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grade 3 proximal humerus giant cell tumours are uncommon and the results of their surgical management with prosthetic replacement are not well established. We retrospectively studied patients with grade 3 giant cell tumours of proximal humerus treated with excision and prosthetic replacement from January 2009 and December 2018. We identified 13 patients who underwent tumour excision and prosthetic replacement. There were 7 (53.8%) men and 6 (46.2%) women. The mean age at diagnosis was 30.4 years (range 16-48 years). The mean follow-up period was 72.2 months (range 24-132). Margins were positive in 4 (30.8%) patients, ≤ 1 mm in 8 (61.5%) patients, and negative in 1 (7.7%) patient. Local recurrence was seen in 2 (15.4%) patients. 1 out of 2 (50%) patients with local recurrence had pathological fracture at presentation and margins were positive in both (100%) patients. There were 3 (23.1%) complications-1 patient with joint subluxation, 1 patient with fracture post trauma, and 1 patient with surgical site infection. The mean overall Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 24 out of 30 (range 21-29). Resection of grade 3 proximal humerus giant cell tumour and reconstruction with prosthesis results in low recurrence rate and good functional outcome and is a valuable treatment option for such tumours.

Indexed as

Benign bone tumoursCampanacci grade 3Local recurrencePathological fractureSurgical clearanceWound infection

Identifiers

PMID38545571
PMCPMC10963681
OpenAlexW4367677992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.