ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Use and acceptance of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine in Germany-an online representative cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health-Related quality of life and the impact of traditional, complementary and integrative Medicine - an Online - Representative Cross-Sectional survey in Germany.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Interest in complementary and alternative medicine among participants in a study on cancer prevention by green tea extract - results from an expert-based survey of MIRACLE trial participants.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Trial
- Integrative multimodal treatment approach for patients suffering from Post-COVID syndrome: a study based on qualitative interviews with individuals participating in an 11-week day clinic program.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Treatment choices: insights into disease-specific use and self-perceived benefits of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine in Germany.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Network-Based, Cross-Sectional Analysis of Drug-Related Problems Reveals a Strong Association of Possible Inappropriate Medication and Clinical Outcomes in Romanian Elderly Nursing Home Residents.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Online information for patients on cancer diets - a comparison of German- and English-language websites.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Oncology: A Concise Review of Utilization, Evidence, and Integration Challenges.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Impact of an Interdisciplinary Integrative Group-Based Program for Patients with Cancer: Prospective, Nonrandomized Intervention Study with a Waiting-List Control.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- From development to implementation through a RE-AIM lense: lessons learned from a qualitative process evaluation of workplace health promotion workshops in long-term care.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Use of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine in Berlin: baseline results from a substudy of the German National Cohort (NAKO).BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Framework for evidence synthesis of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine systems incorporating context and complexity, illustrated by the example of homeopathy.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Use of complementary and integrative medicine for mental disorders-a cross-sectional study in Germany.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Complementary and integrative medicine use in mental disorders: socioeconomic patterns and healthcare utilization in Germany.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Spirituality, religious affiliation, and health in Germany: a cross-sectional study including Bayesian network modeling.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- AI, digital twins, and healthcare utilization behaviour: evidence from a Swiss population survey.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Data on the use of traditional and complementary medicine, WHO Region of the Americas.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Article
- A scoping review of the barriers and facilitators in the use of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine: insights for health policy development.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Health information-seeking behavior among users of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine (TCIM).BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Experiences with complementary and integrative medicine in mental healthcare: a qualitative substudy of the PSYKIM project.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of thyme-ivy syrup on antiviral immune response in patients with mild COVID-19: a prospective, open-label, randomized pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Older representative surveys show that Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine (TCIM) is used by about 60% of the German population. However, no data exists for the current nationwide situation. The main aim of this cross-sectional study is to investigate the current use and acceptance of TCIM in Germany. Methods: This study is based on a representative sample of the German population aged 18-75 years. Participants were asked about the use and acceptance of TCIM. The survey was conducted online using Computer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) in 2022 by three renowned German market research institutes on behalf of and in close coordination with the working group. The data set was analyzed descriptively and inferentially. Results: In total, 4,065 participants (52% female, 48% male, 0.4% diverse) responded completely (response rate: 21.5%). Among participants, 70% stated that they had used TCIM at some point in their lives, with 32% doing so in the last 12 months and 18% currently. The most common reason given (17%) was musculoskeletal pain. For their own health, 39% stated that TCIM is important. Traditional European Medicine was rated as very/mainly effective by 27% of participants and as partly effective by 44% (conventional medicine: 69% very/mainly effective, 19% partly effective). As a complementary treatment strategy to conventional medicine, 35% considered TCIM to be optimal ("Complementary Medicine"), 33% in combination with conventional medicine ("Integrative Medicine") and 5% without conventional medicine ("Alternative Medicine"). The majority of the participants were in favor of more research on TCIM and stated that the costs of TCIM services should be covered by health insurance companies (71% and 69%, respectively). Conclusion: These results from a representative online-population suggest that the use of TCIM in Germany remains at a high level. The nationwide relevance of TCIM should be given greater consideration in German health care policy making. TCIM should be systematically investigated using appropriate study designs and methods including high quality randomized clinical trials to investigate their effectiveness, efficacy, therapeutic safety and costs in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.