ReviewCurrent research in pharmacology and drug discovery2024
Abelacimab: A leap forward in anticoagulation with FXI and FXIa Inhibition.
Review in Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factor XI Inhibitors in Atrial Fibrillation: Insights and Implications from Recent Trials.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- TheResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Asundexian: a systematic review of safety, efficacy, and pharmacological insights in thrombosis.Thrombosis journal · 2025Review
- Antithrombotic Therapy in the Elderly with Cardiovascular Disease: Walking the Tightrope Between Efficacy and Bleeding Risk-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Protective effects of factor XI inhibition by abelacimab in a baboon model of live Staphylococcus aureus sepsis.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2025Article
- What is new in cardiac anesthesia in 2024?Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Anticoagulation Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation in CKD Stage G5 and Dialysis Patients: An Updated Scoping Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Abelacimab for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Translating Dual FXI/XIa Inhibition from Mechanism to Clinical Prospects.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have revolutionized the treatment of thromboembolic disorders, offering targeted, effective, and safer alternatives to traditional anticoagulants like heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Despite their benefits, DOACs have drawbacks, including an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and unsuitability for patients with mechanical heart valves. Recent research has highlighted Factor XI (FXI) as a promising anticoagulation target due to its significant role in pathological thrombosis and minor involvement in normal hemostasis. Abelacimab, an antibody that inhibits FXI, has shown potential in transforming anticoagulation therapy by sparing hemostasis. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of abelacimab, examining its clinical pharmacology and its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. It scrutinizes abelacimab's safety profile and key monitoring parameters. The current evidence supporting its use and potential future research strengthening its position in anticoagulant therapy is also discussed. The objective is to enhance understanding and contribute to discussions around developing safer anticoagulants, particularly for patients at risk for thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.