Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38545496›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pain2024

Ferran Vilalta-Abella, Bruno Porras-Garcia, Alexandra Ghiţă, Montserrat Vacas-Moreira, Mónica Prat-Galbany, José Gutiérrez-Maldonado

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ferran Vilalta-AbellaUnit of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital of Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Sant Joan Despí, Spain.
Bruno Porras-GarciaBrainXR Lab, Department of Basic Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.
Alexandra GhiţăUnit of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-7557
Montserrat Vacas-MoreiraUnit of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital of Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Sant Joan Despí, Spain.
Mónica Prat-GalbanyUnit of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital of Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Sant Joan Despí, Spain.
José Gutiérrez-MaldonadoDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital de Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi · ESLeiden University · NLUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a disorder characterized by chronic pain, with significant medical, psychological, and socio-economic implications. Although there is limited evidence, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has shown to be effective in improving FM symptoms. An alternative to enhance CBT effectiveness is to incorporate digital therapeutics (DTx). Aim: We conducted a pilot study to investigate whether the addition of a DTx intervention ( Method: Ten patients with FM were initially recruited from a public hospital in Barcelona. The treatment consisted of 6 weeks of Results: The program (DTx and CBGT) showed a significant improvement in pain-related self-efficacy and relaxation measures. Improvement in pain perception was observed only after the DTx intervention. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary results regarding the added value of DTx (

Indexed as

cognitive-behavioral group therapydigital therapeuticsfibromyalgiagroup treatmentpain perception

Identifiers

PMID38545496
PMCPMC10964857
OpenAlexW4388314538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.