ArticleJAAD international2024
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions in a tertiary care center in Jamaica.
Article in JAAD international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An international scoping review of epidemiologic studies on severe cutaneous adverse reactions.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026Article
- [Frequency of cutaneous drug reactions in the outpatient dermatology clinic at the National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio Chávez over a ten-year period].Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are associated with morbidity and mortality. Objective: The aim was to determine the different types of SCARs, their morphology, common offending drugs, interventions, and outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients admitted to the dermatology service at the University Hospital of the West Indies with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), SJS/toxic epidermal necrolysis overlap (TEN), TEN, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis between January 1, 2012 to June 1, 2022. Results: Fifty-one cases (51) met the inclusion criteria for SCAR. SJS, SJS/TEN overlap and TEN together accounted for 71.2% of cases. SCARs were most frequent in the fourth, fifth and 6th decades of life and there was a female preponderance. Antibiotics (31%) and anticonvulsants (29%) were the most common causative agents for SCARs. Most patients had at least 1 complication. The liver was the most common extracutaneous organ affected. Mortality was 7.8%. The main cause of death was sepsis. Limitations: Results were not generalizable. There were missing data and loss to follow-up. Conclusion: Judicious use of antimicrobials and corticosteroids may be beneficial in treatment of severe cutaneous drug reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.