ReviewWorld journal of oncology2024
Pigs: Large Animal Preclinical Cancer Models.
Review in World journal of oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Porcine submandibular glands as potential salivary gland experimental models: histological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural characterization.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- Harnessing PDX and PDX 2.0: the next-generation paradigm for precision oncology and translational breakthroughs.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Schwannomatosis tumor modeling: progress and prospects for translational research.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Hepatoprotective Potential of Curcumin in the Prevention of Liver Dysfunction in a Porcine Model.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Structural and functional comparative analysis of porcine and human salivary glands: a narrative review for translational research.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Review
- The significance of CEACAM60, a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) homolog, as a tumor antigen in the porcine cancer model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Characterization of a bronchoscopically induced transgenic lung cancer pig model for human translatability.Lab animal · 2026Article
- Fine Particulate Matter (PM) Effects on Swine Granulosa and Ovarian Endothelial Cells.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Review
- Baseline Characterization of Swine Leukocyte Antigen Diversity in GFP-Expressing Domestic Swine.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025Article
- The paradigm shift: re-evaluating preclinical animal models for colorectal cancer in the precision medicine era.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Direct pulmonary delivery route in lung cancer: a highway for siRNA therapeutics.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- The Pivotal Role of Preclinical Animal Models in Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery and Personalized Cancer Therapy Strategies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A TriAdj-AdjuvantedVaccines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pigs are playing an increasingly vital role as translational biomedical models for studying human pathophysiology. The annotation of the pig genome was a huge step forward in translatability of pigs as a biomedical model for various human diseases. Similarities between humans and pigs in terms of anatomy, physiology, genetics, and immunology have allowed pigs to become a comprehensive preclinical model for human diseases. With a diverse range, from craniofacial and ophthalmology to reproduction, wound healing, musculoskeletal, and cancer, pigs have provided a seminal understanding of human pathophysiology. This review focuses on the current research using pigs as preclinical models for cancer research and highlights the strengths and opportunities for studying various human cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.