ArticleWorld journal of oncology2024
Lipid Profiles Impact on the Oncologic Outcome of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.
Article in World journal of oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic profile and skeletal muscle as predictors of survival in testicular germ cell tumors.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Navigating the obesity paradox in bladder cancer prognosis-insights from the Taiwan National Health Insurance System Database.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) varies, with T3/T4 UTUC having less than 50% 5-year survival post-radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Lipid profiles including cholesterol (CHOL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and triglycerides (TGs), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) have shown correlations with oncologic outcomes in various cancers. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of the lipid profiles in UTUC patients who had received RNU. Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 217 UTUC patients who underwent RNU were analyzed. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression model and competing risk analysis. Results: The median follow-up duration was 2.36 years. Fifty-one (23.50%) of the patients experienced tumor progression, 16 (7.37%) died from UTUC, and 41 (18.89%) died from all causes during the follow-up period. Multivariate analysis revealed that elevated CHOL, low HDL, and elevated TG were linked to worse OS (P = 0.0188, 0.0002, and 0.0001, respectively). Higher CHOL, LDL, and TG, as well as lower HDL significantly affected PFS (P < 0.001 for all), and elevated CHOL and TG were associated with poorer CSS (P = 0.0033 and 0.0179). A competing risk model indicated that elevated LDL increased the risk of cancer progression (P = 0.407), with CHOL increasing the risk of UTUC-specific mortality (P = 0.0162). Limitations include retrospective design, limited, single-time sampling and relatively small sample size. Conclusions: Lipid profiles were identified as prognostic indicators for UTUC patients post-RNU. It highlights the potential importance of lipid management in improving tumor-related outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.