Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38545460›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical & translational endocrinology2024

Patient and caregiver perspectives of fluid discharge protocols following pituitary surgery.

Julia J Chang, Alexis Amano, Cati Brown-Johnson, Olivia Chu, Victoria Gates-Bazarbay, Erin Wipff, Samantha M R Kling, Mohamed Alhadha, Juan Carlos Fernandez-Miranda, Stacie Vilendrer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julia J ChangDivision of Endocrinology, Gerontology, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Grant - S025, Mail Code 5103, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Alexis AmanoDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Rd., Mail Code 5475, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Cati Brown-JohnsonDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Rd., Mail Code 5475, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Olivia ChuNeuroscience Health Center, Stanford Health Care, 213 Quarry Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Victoria Gates-BazarbayNeuroscience Health Center, Stanford Health Care, 213 Quarry Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Erin WipffNeuroscience Health Center, Stanford Health Care, 213 Quarry Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Samantha M R KlingDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Rd., Mail Code 5475, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Mohamed AlhadhaStanford Medicine Center for Improvement, 180 El Camino Real, Suite 1199, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Juan Carlos Fernandez-MirandaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 453 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Stacie VilendrerDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Rd., Mail Code 5475, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stanford University · USStanford Health Care · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

AHRQ HHS T32 HS000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post-operative fluid restriction after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) for pituitary tumors may effectively prevent delayed hyponatremia, the most common cause of readmission. However, implementation of individualized fluid restriction interventions after discharge is often complex and poses challenges for provider and patient. The purpose of this study was to understand the factors necessary for successful implementation of fluid restriction and discharge care protocols following TSS. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with fifteen patients and four caregivers on fluid discharge protocols were conducted following TSS. Patients and caregivers who had surgery before and after the implementation of updated discharge protocols were interviewed. Data were analyzed inductively using a procedure informed by rapid and thematic analysis. Results: Most patients and caregivers perceived fluid restriction protocols as acceptable and feasible when indicated. Facilitators to the protocols included clear communication about the purpose of and strategies for fluid restriction, access to the care team, and involvement of patients' caregivers in care discussions. Barriers included patient confusion about differences in the care plan between teams, physical discomfort of fluid restriction, increased burden of tracking fluids during recovery, and lack of clarity surrounding desmopressin prescriptions. Conclusion: Outpatient fluid restriction protocols are a feasible intervention following pituitary surgery but requires frequent patient communication and education. This evaluation highlights the importance of patient engagement and feedback to effectively develop and implement complex clinical interventions.

Indexed as

HyponatremiaPituitary tumorQuality improvementTranssphenoidal surgery

Identifiers

PMID38545460
PMCPMC10965805
OpenAlexW4392877998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.