Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38545442›Full record

ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2024

Modelling the unexpected dynamics of COVID-19 in Manaus, Brazil.

Daihai He, Yael Artzy-Randrup, Salihu S Musa, Tiago Gräf, Felipe Naveca, Lewi Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daihai HeDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yael Artzy-RandrupDepartment of Theoretical and Computational Ecology, IBED, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Salihu S MusaDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Tiago GräfInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fiocruz, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Felipe NavecaInstituto Leônidas e Maria Deane, Fiocruz, Manaus, Brazil.
Lewi StoneMathematical Sciences, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In late March 2020, SARS-CoV-2 arrived in Manaus, Brazil, and rapidly developed into a large-scale epidemic that collapsed the local health system and resulted in extreme death rates. Several key studies reported that ∼76% of residents of Manaus were infected (attack rate AR≃76%) by October 2020, suggesting protective herd immunity had been reached. Despite this, an unexpected second wave of COVID-19 struck again in November and proved to be larger than the first, creating a catastrophe for the unprepared population. It has been suggested that this could be possible if the second wave was driven by reinfections. However, it is widely reported that reinfections were at a low rate (before the emergence of Omicron), and reinfections tend to be mild. Here, we use novel methods to model the epidemic from mortality data without considering reinfection-caused deaths and evaluate the impact of interventions to explain why the second wave appeared. The method fits a "flexible" reproductive number

Indexed as

COVID-19Herd immunityModellingReinfectionReproduction number

Identifiers

PMID38545442
PMCPMC10966176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.