Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38545426›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Predicting skin cancer risk from facial images with an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) based approach: a proof-of-concept study.

Xianjing Liu, Tobias E Sangers, Tamar Nijsten, Manfred Kayser, Luba M Pardo, Eppo B Wolvius, Gennady V Roshchupkin, Marlies Wakkee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07765303 (Skin Pigment Type, Phototype and Photodamage Determination Using Image Analyses Powered by Artificial Intelligence - SPAI Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07765303 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Skin Pigment Type, Phototype and Photodamage Determination Using Image Analyses Powered by Artificial Intelligence - SPAI Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorRegion SkaneRan2025 to 2028Enrolled1,500ConditionsSkin Ageing, SkinArmsSkin imaging and skin characteristic assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xianjing LiuDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Tobias E SangersDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Tamar NijstenDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Manfred KayserDepartment of Genetic Identification, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Luba M PardoDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Eppo B WolviusDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Gennady V RoshchupkinDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marlies WakkeeDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Efficient identification of individuals at high risk of skin cancer is crucial for implementing personalized screening strategies and subsequent care. While Artificial Intelligence holds promising potential for predictive analysis using image data, its application for skin cancer risk prediction utilizing facial images remains unexplored. We present a neural network-based explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approach for skin cancer risk prediction based on 2D facial images and compare its efficacy to 18 established skin cancer risk factors using data from the Rotterdam Study. Methods: The study employed data from the Rotterdam population-based study in which both skin cancer risk factors and 2D facial images and the occurrence of skin cancer were collected from 2010 to 2018. We conducted a deep-learning survival analysis based on 2D facial images using our developed XAI approach. We subsequently compared these results with survival analysis based on skin cancer risk factors using cox proportional hazard regression. Findings: Among the 2810 participants (mean Age = 68.5 ± 9.3 years, average Follow-up = 5.0 years), 228 participants were diagnosed with skin cancer after photo acquisition. Our XAI approach achieved superior predictive accuracy based on 2D facial images (c-index = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.70-0.74), outperforming that of the known risk factors (c-index = 0.59, 95% CI 0.57-0.61). Interpretation: This proof-of-concept study underscores the high potential of harnessing facial images and a tailored XAI approach as an easily accessible alternative over known risk factors for identifying individuals at high risk of skin cancer. Funding: The Rotterdam Study is funded through unrestricted research grants from Erasmus Medical Center and Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands Organization for the Health Research and Development (ZonMw), the Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE), the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, the Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sports, the European Commission (DG XII), and the Municipality of Rotterdam. G.V. Roshchupkin is supported by the ZonMw Veni grant (Veni, 549 1936320).

Indexed as

Deep learningExplainable artificial intelligenceRisk predictionSkin cancerSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID38545426
PMCPMC10965465
OpenAlexW4392945942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.