Translation into Spanish of: "Changes to publication requirements made at the XVIII International Botanical Congress in Melbourne - what does e-publication mean for you?". Translated by Carmen Ulloa Ulloa, Lourdes Rico Arce, and Renée H. Fortunato Cambios a los requisitos para publicar realizados en el XVIII Congreso Internacional de Botánica en Melbourne - ¿qué significado tiene la publicación electrónica para usted?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. PhytoKeys at 100: progress in sustainability, innovation, and speed to enhance publication in plant systematics.PhytoKeys · 2018
   Article
2. On the front line of modern data-management and Open Access publishing: Two years of PhytoKeys - the fastest growing journal in plant systematics.PhytoKeys · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract