ArticleJournal of bone oncology2024
Denosumab induction and Zoledronic acid maintenance therapy for recurrent unresectable giant cell tumour of the distal tibia: A case report with sustained tumour control after drug withdrawal.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- What's new on giant cell tumor of bone.SICOT-J · 2026Article
- Rethinking the role of bisphosphonates after denosumab treatment in locally advanced or unresectable aneurysmal bone cysts: A meta-analysis.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
- Treatment of Extraosseous Giant Cell Tumor of Bone and Calcitriol-Mediated Hypercalcemia With Denosumab in Paget Disease.JCEM case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 31-year-old woman was diagnosed with a recurrent and rapidly growing giant cell tumour of distal tibia with skin ulceration after intralesional curettage. The patient started on Denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously, once per month with additional loading doses on Days 8 and 15 attempting to avoid below-knee amputation. Twelve doses of Denosumab were administered in 9 months, resulting in resolution of pain, reduction of tumour size and calcification. Hence, the local surgical treatment was delayed and bisphosphonate maintenance therapy was initiated as skin healing was incomplete. The patient was given Zoledronic acid infusions at a dose of 4 mg. After the third infusion, the skin healed. As tumour remained stable, it was decided to continue maintenance. Overall, six doses of Zoledronic acid at 6 months intervals were administrated over 3 years. At the end of the maintenance, the patient experienced no pain and satisfied with her limb function. Since the lesion remained stable over 3 years after Denosumab discontinuation, it was suggested to stop further medical treatment and proceed to active surveillance. The patient's disease is still stable clinical remission with no serious adverse events 41 months after Denosumab cessation and 10 months after the last bisphosphonate infusion. The present case confirmed the high effectiveness of denosumab as induction therapy in advanced recurrent giant cell tumour. We speculate that following the Denosumab-induced tumour ossification, high Zoledronic acid uptake in lesion may prevent tumour reactivation due to its improved pharmacodynamics with an assumed irreversible anti-tumoral effect on residual mutated cells. This hypothesis requires confirmation in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.