ArticleHeliyon2024
Halo vest fixation effectively maintains cervical alignment through intraoperative repositioning in patients with cervical spine instability.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes of elderly patients treated with halo vest immobilization.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of this study was to examine if halo vest fixation provides sufficient stabilization of cervical spine alignment to endorse its use through intraoperative positional changes in patients with cervical spine instability. Methods: The subjects of this study were 14 patients with cervical spine instability who were immobilized in halo vests until they underwent subsequent internal fixation surgery. After induction of anesthesia, the patients in halo vests were repositioned from the supine position to the prone position. The halo ring was fixed to the surgical table and the dorsal struts and vest were removed for surgery. Radiographs obtained in the preoperative sitting position and intraoperative prone position were compared for the following measures of cervical alignment: O-C2 angle, C2-C6 angle, pharyngeal inlet angle (PIA), atlantodental interval (ADI), Redlund-Johnell (R-J) value as a measure of O-C2 length, O-C6 length, and O-C2 length/O-C6 length (%). Results: There were no significant differences in O-C2 angle, C2-C6 angle, PIA, ADI, or O-C2 length/O-C6 length (%). However, the R-J value and O-C6 length were significantly higher in the intraoperative prone position than in the preoperative sitting position. None of the patients presented with any complications, including dysphagia or neurological deterioration. Conclusions: Our results suggest that when patients are repositioned to the prone position while immobilized in halo vests, the cervical spine is distracted in the cephalocaudal direction across all cervical segments but the cervical alignment is sufficiently maintained. Halo vests are a highly effective external fixation method for patients with cervical spine instability, allowing for a safe repositioning to the prone position for surgery while preserving cervical alignment and preventing neurological deterioration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.